| From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pgFoundry |
| Date: | 2004-03-11 19:55:09 |
| Message-ID: | 200403111155.09851.josh@agliodbs.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-www |
Peter,
> Everybody had agreed to <project>.postgresql.net, and now it's gone
> without explanation.
Oh! Well, if that's what you want, why didn't you say so? We can certainly
change things since it's not official yet.
Like I said, I wasn't clear that there was a consensus for the postgresql.net
scheme. Can other people speak up about this?
--
-Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2004-03-11 20:29:29 | Re: pgFoundry |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2004-03-11 19:38:56 | Re: pgFoundry |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2004-03-11 20:29:29 | Re: pgFoundry |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2004-03-11 19:38:56 | Re: pgFoundry |