| From: | Michael Fuhr <mike(at)fuhr(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | mark(at)mark(dot)mielke(dot)cc |
| Cc: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Are NULLs in Arrays compressed? |
| Date: | 2005-11-22 03:12:10 |
| Message-ID: | 20051122031210.GA96681@winnie.fuhr.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Nov 21, 2005 at 04:46:40PM -0500, mark(at)mark(dot)mielke(dot)cc wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 21, 2005 at 08:51:32PM +0000, Simon Riggs wrote:
> > Are NULLs in Arrays compressed?
> > Just as NULLs are with normal unary datatypes.
>
> I thought NULLs don't work in arrays yet? :-)
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-committers/2005-11/msg00385.php
http://developer.postgresql.org/docs/postgres/arrays.html
--
Michael Fuhr
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Petr Jelinek | 2005-11-22 03:20:12 | Re: MERGE vs REPLACE |
| Previous Message | Qingqing Zhou | 2005-11-22 03:01:47 | Re: Use of 8192 as BLCKSZ in xlog.c |