From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>, Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> |
Subject: | Re: Reducing relation locking overhead |
Date: | 2005-12-03 20:16:27 |
Message-ID: | 20051203201627.GB31396@surnet.cl |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Simon Riggs wrote:
> Understood. At 7.3, REINDEXing is essential, since rows never got
> deleted and space was not reused. That is not the case now, hence a
> REINDEX is less often required.
But it's still required or at least desirable under some circumstances.
If it could be improved, it would be good.
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Zoltan Boszormenyi | 2005-12-03 21:23:44 | SERIAL type feature request |
Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2005-12-03 19:39:53 | Re: Reducing relation locking overhead |