| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com |
| Cc: | Tino Wildenhain <tino(at)wildenhain(dot)de>, Zoltan Boszormenyi <zboszor(at)dunaweb(dot)hu> |
| Subject: | Re: SERIAL type feature request |
| Date: | 2005-12-03 23:06:02 |
| Message-ID: | 200512040006.04298.peter_e@gmx.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Josh Berkus wrote:
> I believe that our SERIAL/SEQUENCE stuff is already in compliance
> with the SQL standard for sequences (in SQL03). Why would we change
> it?
Because your belief is wrong, but Zoltan's proposal is not getting is
closer.
--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Uwe C. Schroeder | 2005-12-03 23:07:19 | Re: 8.1, OID's and plpgsql |
| Previous Message | Qingqing Zhou | 2005-12-03 22:55:35 | Re: Building Windows Server Extensions Using VC++ 2005 |