From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Min Xid problem proposal |
Date: | 2005-12-09 19:19:39 |
Message-ID: | 20051209191939.GB27670@surnet.cl |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> > Ok, so I shall go back to the original patch, which did exactly this.
> > Is it OK for applying?
>
> I haven't looked at it ... when did you post it exactly?
From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2005 23:40:52 -0300
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] [HACKERS] Per-table freeze limit proposal
I have a version that applies cleanly to current CVS tip. Do I post it
again?
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Qingqing Zhou | 2005-12-09 19:20:57 | Re: Warm-cache prefetching |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2005-12-09 19:17:22 | Re: Log of CREATE USER statement |