| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Dave Page <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Cc: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org, Lukas Kahwe Smith <smith(at)pooteeweet(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: EnterpriseDB Postgres |
| Date: | 2007-08-08 19:35:50 |
| Message-ID: | 200708082135.50823.peter_e@gmx.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-www |
Dave Page wrote:
> This is why the likes of Oracle and IBM use similar non-specific
> installera.
And the fact that PostgreSQL does not require such nonsense is a major
selling point.
--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2007-08-08 19:41:23 | Re: EnterpriseDB Postgres |
| Previous Message | David Fetter | 2007-08-08 19:30:00 | Re: EnterpriseDB Postgres |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2007-08-08 19:41:23 | Re: EnterpriseDB Postgres |
| Previous Message | David Fetter | 2007-08-08 19:30:00 | Re: EnterpriseDB Postgres |