From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL) |
Date: | 2007-08-29 11:38:13 |
Message-ID: | 200708291338.14301.peter_e@gmx.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
Am Dienstag, 28. August 2007 18:34 schrieb Neil Conway:
> On Tue, 2007-28-08 at 11:15 -0400, Robert Bernier wrote:
> > How many people feel we should adopt 'postgres' for the '9.0'
> > reference documentation (let's leave the issue of the tons of work
> > involved out of the debate for the moment)?
>
> +1 -- I think we should make the name change, but I don't have any
> strong preference about when we ought to do it (now, for 8.3, for 8.4,
> etc -- I wouldn't necessarily want to wait for some far-off theoretical
> 9.0 release).
I agree with that.
--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jonah H. Harris | 2007-08-29 12:40:25 | Re: When MySQL Bites: Quirks to Watch Out For |
Previous Message | vincent | 2007-08-29 08:05:55 | Re: When MySQL Bites: Quirks to Watch Out For |