| From: | Decibel! <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Devrim G?ND?Z <devrim(at)CommandPrompt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, PostgreSQL advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL) |
| Date: | 2007-09-03 20:53:20 |
| Message-ID: | 20070903205320.GC38801@decibel.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-de-allgemein |
On Mon, Sep 03, 2007 at 10:39:49PM +0300, Devrim G?ND?Z wrote:
> better things. Will this change make PostgreSQL faster? Or will it add a
> big major feature that will attract thousands of new users? I don't
Yes, it'll give us a name that's pronouncable and not confusing.
--
Decibel!, aka Jim Nasby decibel(at)decibel(dot)org
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com 512.569.9461 (cell)
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Devrim GÜNDÜZ | 2007-09-03 20:58:39 | Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL) |
| Previous Message | Jan Wieck | 2007-09-03 20:47:31 | Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL) |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Devrim GÜNDÜZ | 2007-09-03 20:58:39 | Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL) |
| Previous Message | Jan Wieck | 2007-09-03 20:47:31 | Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL) |