| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Trevor Talbot" <quension(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Simplifying Text Search |
| Date: | 2007-11-15 10:01:50 |
| Message-ID: | 200711151101.51251.peter_e@gmx.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Am Mittwoch, 14. November 2007 schrieb Trevor Talbot:
> But that coversion itself is fundamentally flawed, is the problem.
I know it's incorrect, but with a different parser and/or dictionary you could
make it work.
In practice, the search pattern will mostly be provided dynamically from some
user input, so you could conceivably be able to modify the search patterns
more readily than the entire queries in your application. Anyway, it's just
an idea for those who need it.
--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Gregory Stark | 2007-11-15 10:08:13 | Re: LDC - Load Distributed Checkpoints with PG8.3b2 on Solaris |
| Previous Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2007-11-15 09:40:25 | Re: LDC - Load Distributed Checkpoints with PG8.3b2 on Solaris |