From: | Ivan Sergio Borgonovo <mail(at)webthatworks(dot)it> |
---|---|
To: | |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: is it helpful for the optimiser/planner to add LIMIT 1 |
Date: | 2008-04-03 15:32:54 |
Message-ID: | 20080403173254.4852cca7@webthatworks.it |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Thu, 03 Apr 2008 10:33:56 -0400
Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
> > You could fix that more cleanly with "ALTER FUNCTION myfunction
> > ROWS 1" but only if that's always true, not just for
> > myfunction(3,5).
>
> Perhaps the function shouldn't be declared SETOF in the first place?
Does I have to take it as:
if it is not declared as SETOF all optimisation and planning marvels
will happen without I add LIMIT 1?
What about queries?
Is it an information that is used for anything else other than
stopping earlier?
Summarising it up: is it worth to add it here and there as an
optimisation flag?
thanks
--
Ivan Sergio Borgonovo
http://www.webthatworks.it
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Dunstan | 2008-04-03 15:33:05 | Re: modules |
Previous Message | Mark Mielke | 2008-04-03 15:32:37 | Re: [GENERAL] SHA1 on postgres 8.3 |