From: | Benjamin Smith <lists(at)benjamindsmith(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Clustering, parallelised operating system, super-computing |
Date: | 2010-08-18 23:39:50 |
Message-ID: | 201008181639.50779.lists@benjamindsmith.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Thursday, May 13, 2010 11:51:08 pm Brian Modra wrote:
> Maybe the best way to solve this is not to do automatic distribution
> of the data, but rather to provide tools for implementing distributed
> references and joins.
Here's my vote! I'd *LOVE* it if I could do a simple cross-database join
(without the ugliness of dblink), it would be just awesome. Two beers for
cross-database foreign keys...
We already do use dblink extensively with a wrapper. for various reporting
functions. Since the cross-database queries are in the minority, it does
function as load balancing, even if the cross-joined queries aren't so
balanced.
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Steve Atkins | 2010-08-18 23:43:01 | Re: Massively Parallel transactioning? |
Previous Message | Benjamin Smith | 2010-08-18 23:32:06 | Massively Parallel transactioning? |