| From: | Abhijit Menon-Sen <ams(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: CF3+4 |
| Date: | 2013-01-17 07:15:52 |
| Message-ID: | 20130117071552.GA9319@toroid.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
At 2013-01-17 16:05:05 +0900, michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com wrote:
>
> Is it really necessary to create a new commit fest just to move the
> items? Marking the patches that are considered as being too late for
> 9.3 should be just returned with feedback.
Opening 2013-03 is not so much to move existing patches, but to give
people a place to submit *new* post-9.3 patches without interrupting
the 2013-01 CF.
-- Abhijit
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Pavan Deolasee | 2013-01-17 07:19:08 | Re: CF3+4 (was Re: Parallel query execution) |
| Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2013-01-17 07:05:05 | Re: CF3+4 |