| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Support for REINDEX CONCURRENTLY |
| Date: | 2013-01-23 18:45:11 |
| Message-ID: | 20130123184511.GH4249@alvh.no-ip.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | Postg윈 토토SQL : |
Andres Freund escribió:
> I somewhat dislike the fact that CONCURRENTLY isn't really concurrent
> here (for the listeners: swapping the indexes acquires exlusive locks) ,
> but I don't see any other naming being better.
REINDEX ALMOST CONCURRENTLY?
--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Gavin Flower | 2013-01-23 18:53:41 | Re: Support for REINDEX CONCURRENTLY |
| Previous Message | Stephen Frost | 2013-01-23 18:44:03 | Re: CF3+4 (was Re: Parallel query execution) |