From: | web(at)mr-paradox(dot)net |
---|---|
To: | Selena Deckelmann <selena(at)chesnok(dot)com> |
Cc: | john melesky <list(at)phaedrusdeinus(dot)org>, web(at)mr-paradox(dot)net, Postgresql PDX_Users <pdxpug(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Heads up on Postgres security release coming April 4, 2013 |
Date: | 2013-04-04 19:00:34 |
Message-ID: | 20130404190034.GB81713@mr-paradox.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pdxpug |
On Thu, Apr 04, 2013 at 11:55:06AM -0700, Selena Deckelmann wrote:
- On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 11:52 AM, David Kerr <dmk(at)mr-paradox(dot)net> wrote:
-
- > On Thu, Apr 04, 2013 at 06:41:45PM +0000, john melesky wrote:
- > - > Can anyone confirm if this is the correct version for the security fix?
- > - >
- > - > postgresql92-server.x86_64 9.2.4-1PGDG.rhel6 @pgdg-92-centos
- > -
- > - 9.2.4 is the correct version, according to the release notice:
- > -
- > - http://www.postgresql.org/about/news/1456/
- >
- > Yeah, but it also says it affects 9.2.4:
- > "The 토토 사이트 has released a security update to
- > all current versions of the
- > PostgreSQL database system, including versions 9.2.4"
- >
-
- The meaning was "the updates include: version, version, version, version"
That makes sense, and what I would normally expect. I don't know why I read this
one differently.
Also, unbeknownst to me, my dev machines have auto-update for security on
so I was wondering how I already had it =)
Thanks again!
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | gabrielle | 2013-05-21 03:36:14 | books, June meeting, OSCON booth signup |
Previous Message | Selena Deckelmann | 2013-04-04 18:55:06 | Re: Heads up on Postgres security release coming April 4, 2013 |