| From: | Abhijit Menon-Sen <ams(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)ymail(dot)com>, Vik Fearing <vik(dot)fearing(at)dalibo(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: idle_in_transaction_timeout |
| Date: | 2014-06-19 09:12:41 |
| Message-ID: | 20140619091241.GD31357@toroid.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
At 2014-06-19 10:58:34 +0200, pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com wrote:
>
> Hello
>
> pgbouncer has idle_transaction_timeout defined some years without any
> problems, so we can take this design
>
> idle_transaction_timeout
Let's steal the name too. :-)
(I didn't realise there was precedent in pgbouncer, but given that the
name is in use already, it'll be less confusing to use that name for
Postgres as well.)
-- Abhijit
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Vik Fearing | 2014-06-19 09:40:45 | Re: GSoC on WAL-logging hash indexes |
| Previous Message | Pavel Stehule | 2014-06-19 08:58:34 | Re: idle_in_transaction_timeout |