| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru> |
| Subject: | Re: GinPageIs* don't actually return a boolean |
| Date: | 2015-08-12 23:09:50 |
| Message-ID: | 20150812230950.GE21836@awork2.anarazel.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2015-08-12 19:03:50 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> The adjacent code is doing something different than a bit-test, though:
> it's checking whether multibit fields have particular values.
Yea, I know, that's why I was on the fence about it. Since you have an
opinion and I couldn't really decide it's pretty clear which direction
to go ;)
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2015-08-12 23:11:36 | Re: count_nulls(VARIADIC "any") |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2015-08-12 23:03:50 | Re: GinPageIs* don't actually return a boolean |