From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: 2016-01 Commitfest |
Date: | 2016-01-18 17:35:55 |
Message-ID: | 20160118173555.GA63366@alvherre.pgsql |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | Postg무지개 토토SQL |
Two weeks into the commitfest, things have moved a bit:
Needs review: 53.
Waiting on Author: 20.
Ready for Committer: 10.
Committed: 16.
Total: 99. https://commitfest.postgresql.org/8/
We have two committed patches since last report -- not a lot for a whole
week. We've managed to review a few patches though: WoA went from 14 to
20. Patch authors have something to do rather just twiddle their
thumbs^W^W^W review others' patches.
Remember: reviewing patches where somebody else has marked themselves as
reviewer is still welcome. You could spot things the other person might
miss.
Committers: There are patches for you to push! Go pick one up right now!
(And remember: marking yourself as committer for a patch makes it
unlikely for anybody else to review/commit it. If you do not intend to
review+commit such a patch soon, it's probably better to remove yourself
as committer.)
Many patches seem stalled without review:
Table partition + join pushdown https://commitfest.postgresql.org/8/325/
multivariate statistics https://commitfest.postgresql.org/8/450/
Implement failover on libpq level https://commitfest.postgresql.org/8/389/
Unique Joins https://commitfest.postgresql.org/8/129/
Replace buffer manager spinlock with atomic operations
https://commitfest.postgresql.org/8/408/
Reviews of those patches would be useful, to keep things moving forward.
--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2016-01-18 17:36:21 | Re: RFC: replace pg_stat_activity.waiting with something more descriptive |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2016-01-18 17:34:13 | Re: Combining Aggregates |