| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Bogus cleanup code in PostgresNode.pm |
| Date: | 2016-04-27 19:20:49 |
| Message-ID: | 20160427192049.GA43498@alvherre.pgsql |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 2:24 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> > Now, whether using END is really an improvement is a separate question.
> > I have the impression that END calls happen in a better-defined order,
> > but I'm not a perl monk.
>
> For the archive's sake, 08af9219 is the result commit.
Thanks!
--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Stephen Frost | 2016-04-27 19:27:21 | Re: pg_dump dump catalog ACLs |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2016-04-27 19:16:23 | Re: pg_dump dump catalog ACLs |