From: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Checksums by default? |
Date: | 2017-01-21 14:03:02 |
Message-ID: | 20170121140302.GA18360@tamriel.snowman.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | Postg토토 사이트 추천SQL |
* Magnus Hagander (magnus(at)hagander(dot)net) wrote:
> Is it time to enable checksums by default, and give initdb a switch to turn
> it off instead?
Yes, please.
We've already agreed to make changes to have a better user experience
and ask those who really care about certain performance aspects to have
to configure for performance instead (see: wal_level changes), I view
this as being very much in that same vein.
I know one argument in the past has been that we don't have a tool that
can be used to check all of the checksums, but that's also changed now
that pgBackRest supports verifying checksums during backups. I'm all
for adding a tool to core to perform a validation too, of course, though
it does make a lot of sense to validate checksums during backup since
you're reading all the pages anyway.
Thanks!
Stephen
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2017-01-21 14:05:08 | Re: Checksums by default? |
Previous Message | Andrew Borodin | 2017-01-21 12:25:34 | Re: Review: GIN non-intrusive vacuum of posting tree |