| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Moser <pitiz29a(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Ibrar Ahmed <ibrar(dot)ahmad(at)gmail(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Anton Dignös <anton(dot)dignoes(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: [PROPOSAL] Temporal query processing with range types |
| Date: | 2019-12-01 03:45:56 |
| Message-ID: | 20191201034556.GK2355@paquier.xyz |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Aug 08, 2019 at 09:58:31AM +0200, Peter Moser wrote:
> Thanks a lot for your effort. We are now trying to put again more work
> and time in this patch.
> We are grateful for any feedback.
The latest patch applies, but does not build because of an OID
conflict. For development purposes, please make sure to use an OID in
the range 8000~9000 which are reserved for development per the
recently-added new project policy. For now I have moved the patch to
next CF, waiting on author.
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2019-12-01 03:53:17 | Re: Do we have a CF manager for November? |
| Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2019-12-01 03:43:11 | Re: NOT IN subquery optimization |