From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
---|---|
To: | Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Neha Sharma <neha(dot)sharma(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Petr Jelinek <petr(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [Logical Replication] TRAP: FailedAssertion("rel->rd_rel->relreplident == REPLICA_IDENTITY_DEFAULT || rel->rd_rel->relreplident == REPLICA_IDENTITY_FULL || rel->rd_rel->relreplident == REPLICA_IDENTITY_INDEX" |
Date: | 2020-01-10 05:01:20 |
Message-ID: | 20200110050120.GH1702@paquier.xyz |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 07:30:34AM +0530, Dilip Kumar wrote:
> On Thu, 9 Jan 2020 at 10:43 PM, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
>> There's not much point in having this assert, right? Given that it
>> covers all choices? Seems better to just drop it.
>
> Yeah right!
Refreshing my mind on that... The two remaining assertions still make
sense for update and delete changes per the restrictions in place in
CheckCmdReplicaIdentity(), and there is a gap with the regression
tests. So combining all that I get the attached patch (origin point
is 665d1fa). Thoughts?
--
Michael
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
logirep-identity.patch | text/x-diff | 3.5 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Mahendra Singh Thalor | 2020-01-10 05:08:50 | Re: [HACKERS] Block level parallel vacuum |
Previous Message | Dilip Kumar | 2020-01-10 04:51:55 | Re: PATCH: logical_work_mem and logical streaming of large in-progress transactions |