From: | Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, hlinnaka <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] WAL logging problem in 9.4.3? |
Date: | 2020-04-04 22:32:12 |
Message-ID: | 20200404223212.GC3442685@rfd.leadboat.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Apr 04, 2020 at 06:24:34PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Shouldn't the CF entry get closed?
Once the buildfarm is clean for a day, sure. The buildfarm has already
revealed a missing perl2host call.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Mark Dilger | 2020-04-04 22:34:38 | Re: Should we add xid_current() or a int8->xid cast? |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2020-04-04 22:24:34 | Re: [HACKERS] WAL logging problem in 9.4.3? |