From: | Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dmitriy Kuzmin <kuzmin(dot)db4(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Startup process on a hot standby crashes with an error "invalid memory alloc request size 1073741824" while replaying "Standby/LOCK" records |
Date: | 2022-10-05 00:15:31 |
Message-ID: | 20221005001531.GC779730@nathanxps13 |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | 503 사설 토토 사이트 페치 실패 pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Oct 04, 2022 at 07:53:11PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> I wrote:
>> PFA a quick-hack fix that solves this issue by making per-transaction
>> subsidiary hash tables. That's overkill perhaps; I'm a little worried
>> about whether this slows down normal cases more than it's worth.
>> But we ought to do something about this, because aside from the
>> duplication aspect the current storage of these lists seems mighty
>> space-inefficient.
>
> After further thought, maybe it'd be better to do it as attached,
> with one long-lived hash table for all the locks. This is a shade
> less space-efficient than the current code once you account for
> dynahash overhead, but the per-transaction overhead should be lower
> than the previous patch since we only need to create/destroy a hash
> table entry not a whole hash table.
This feels like a natural way to solve this problem. I saw several cases
of the issue that was fixed with 6301c3a, so I'm inclined to believe this
usage pattern is actually somewhat common.
--
Nathan Bossart
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Kyotaro Horiguchi | 2022-10-05 01:41:03 | Re: Startup process on a hot standby crashes with an error "invalid memory alloc request size 1073741824" while replaying "Standby/LOCK" records |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2022-10-04 23:53:11 | Re: Startup process on a hot standby crashes with an error "invalid memory alloc request size 1073741824" while replaying "Standby/LOCK" records |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Kyotaro Horiguchi | 2022-10-05 01:41:03 | Re: Startup process on a hot standby crashes with an error "invalid memory alloc request size 1073741824" while replaying "Standby/LOCK" records |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2022-10-04 23:53:11 | Re: Startup process on a hot standby crashes with an error "invalid memory alloc request size 1073741824" while replaying "Standby/LOCK" records |