| From: | Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com |
| Cc: | depesz(at)depesz(dot)com, pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Logical replication is missing block of rows when sending initial sync? |
| Date: | 2023-11-02 01:17:13 |
| Message-ID: | 20231102.101713.170587046871054404.horikyota.ntt@gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
At Mon, 30 Oct 2023 07:10:35 +0000, "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com> wrote in
> I've tried, but I could not reproduce the failure. PSA the script what I did.
I'm not well-versed in the details of logical replication, but does
logical replication inherently operate in such a way that it fully
maintains relationships between tables? If not, isn't it possible that
the issue in question is not about missing referenced data, but merely
a temporary delay?
regards.
--
Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrei Lepikhov | 2023-11-02 02:10:40 | Re: BUG #18170: Unexpected error: no relation entry for relid 3 |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2023-11-01 23:38:47 | Re: Wrong result for comparing ROW(...) with IS NOT NULL |