Re: Questions about document "Concurrenry control" section

From: "Peter J(dot) Holzer" <hjp-pgsql(at)hjp(dot)at>
To: pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Questions about document "Concurrenry control" section
Date: 2024-10-12 10:09:05
Message-ID: 20241012100905.lkba5t3pbrrs4cg6@hjp.at
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: Postg배트맨 토토SQL

On 2024-10-12 10:25:08 +0800, iseki zero wrote:
> So, should I use the [reply to all] button?

This mailing-list (like most lists) sets the "List-Post" header:

List-Post: <mailto:pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>

So the best thing would be for the mail program to detect that and offer
a [reply to list] button. Not many do, though, so [reply to all] is
probably your best choice.

> I'm afraid the receipt list will growing to have too many address.

Not much of a problem since usually there won't be that many people
participating in a thread.

> BTW, I'm using Thunderbird. If you have better software, tell me please.

I'm using (neo)mutt, but these days the limitations of a text-only
mailer can be quite noticeable.

hp

--
_ | Peter J. Holzer | Story must make more sense than reality.
|_|_) | |
| | | hjp(at)hjp(dot)at | -- Charles Stross, "Creative writing
__/ | http://www.hjp.at/ | challenge!"

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter J. Holzer 2024-10-12 10:17:19 Re: Questions about document "Concurrenry control" section
Previous Message Adrian Klaver 2024-10-12 04:21:16 Re: Questions about document "Concurrenry control" section