From: | "Peter J(dot) Holzer" <hjp-pgsql(at)hjp(dot)at> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Questions about document "Concurrenry control" section |
Date: | 2024-10-12 10:09:05 |
Message-ID: | 20241012100905.lkba5t3pbrrs4cg6@hjp.at |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | Postg배트맨 토토SQL |
On 2024-10-12 10:25:08 +0800, iseki zero wrote:
> So, should I use the [reply to all] button?
This mailing-list (like most lists) sets the "List-Post" header:
List-Post: <mailto:pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
So the best thing would be for the mail program to detect that and offer
a [reply to list] button. Not many do, though, so [reply to all] is
probably your best choice.
> I'm afraid the receipt list will growing to have too many address.
Not much of a problem since usually there won't be that many people
participating in a thread.
> BTW, I'm using Thunderbird. If you have better software, tell me please.
I'm using (neo)mutt, but these days the limitations of a text-only
mailer can be quite noticeable.
hp
--
_ | Peter J. Holzer | Story must make more sense than reality.
|_|_) | |
| | | hjp(at)hjp(dot)at | -- Charles Stross, "Creative writing
__/ | http://www.hjp.at/ | challenge!"
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter J. Holzer | 2024-10-12 10:17:19 | Re: Questions about document "Concurrenry control" section |
Previous Message | Adrian Klaver | 2024-10-12 04:21:16 | Re: Questions about document "Concurrenry control" section |