Re: pg_dump --no-comments confusion

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
To: Erik Wienhold <ewie(at)ewie(dot)name>
Cc: Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_dump --no-comments confusion
Date: 2024-11-05 09:12:20
Message-ID: 202411050912.getghdvbobdn@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: Postg토토 캔SQL :

On 2024-Nov-04, Erik Wienhold wrote:

> I think Bruce's suggestion is pretty clear that it does not mean line or
> block comments, but rather the COMMENT command. But I also think that
> "SQL" in front of the command name is unnecessary [...]

+1 for "Do not dump COMMENT commands", which is what I think you're
saying.

--
Álvaro Herrera PostgreSQL Developer — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
"Pensar que el espectro que vemos es ilusorio no lo despoja de espanto,
sólo le suma el nuevo terror de la locura" (Perelandra, C.S. Lewis)

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ronan Dunklau 2024-11-05 09:14:02 Re: Converting contrib SQL functions to new style
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2024-11-05 09:08:17 Re: Doc: typo in config.sgml