| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "scott(dot)marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)ihs(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Gavin Sherry <swm(at)linuxworld(dot)com(dot)au>, "Alex J(dot) Avriette" <alex(at)posixnap(dot)net>, Dennis Bjorklund <db(at)zigo(dot)dhs(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Tablespaces |
| Date: | 2004-02-27 17:42:15 |
| Message-ID: | 20517.1077903735@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-hackers-win32 |
"scott.marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)ihs(dot)com> writes:
> Is possible / reasonable / smart and or dumb to look at implementing the
> tablespaces as riding atop the initlocation handled stuff.
In my mind, one of the main benefits of this work will be that we'll be
able to get *rid* of the initlocation stuff. It's a crock.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | scott.marlowe | 2004-02-27 17:56:32 | Re: Tablespaces |
| Previous Message | Lee Kindness | 2004-02-27 16:54:39 | Re: Thread safe connection-name mapping in ECPG. Is it |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | scott.marlowe | 2004-02-27 17:56:32 | Re: Tablespaces |
| Previous Message | scott.marlowe | 2004-02-27 15:28:31 | Re: Tablespaces |