From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com> |
Cc: | Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] Sync vs. fsync during checkpoint |
Date: | 2004-02-10 01:27:05 |
Message-ID: | 21793.1076376425@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-hackers-win32 |
Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com> writes:
> Doing this is not just what you call it. In a system with let's say 500
> active backends on a database with let's say 1000 things that are
> represented as a file, you'll need half a million virtual file descriptors.
[shrug] We've been dealing with virtual file descriptors for years.
I've seen no indication that they create any performance bottlenecks.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Christopher Kings-Lynne | 2004-02-10 02:19:30 | SSL mode annoyance |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2004-02-10 01:24:56 | Re: CVS HEAD compile failure on Freebsd 4.9 |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Daniel Gerardo Lucero Baylon | 2004-02-11 23:11:18 | Problem with win 32 libpq calls |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2004-02-09 21:43:28 | Re: [PATCHES] win32 signals, part 5 |