| From: | Zeugswetter Andreas IZ5 <Andreas(dot)Zeugswetter(at)telecom(dot)at> |
|---|---|
| To: | "'hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org'" <hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | shared lib names |
| Date: | 1999-07-16 15:19:17 |
| Message-ID: | 219F68D65015D011A8E000006F8590C60339E07D@sdexcsrv1.f000.d0188.sd.spardat.at |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Why are our shared libs called e.g. ecpg.so and not libecpg.so ?
This seems strange to me, and it also complicates the link,
since now I cannot say -lecpg and decide whether to link static or shared
with the corresponding linker flag (-bnso or -brtl on AIX)
Andreas
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Thomas Lockhart | 1999-07-16 15:34:09 | Re: [HACKERS] shared lib names |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 1999-07-16 14:49:19 | Oversize proc sources (was Re: [BUGS] Backend dies creating plpgsql procedures (with reproducible example!)) |