| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Why does load_external_function() return PGFunction? |
| Date: | 2018-03-26 19:26:00 |
| Message-ID: | 22383.1522092360@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> On 2018-02-06 15:43:29 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> void* isn't necessarily compatible with function pointers --- there are
>> platforms where they're physically different widths, though possibly
>> you'd never get PG to run on such hardware anyway.
> Btw, given that we store function pointers in datums, that ship has
> sailed a long while ago, no?
We do? Data pointers, sure, but I can't think of any use of the other.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2018-03-26 19:46:40 | Re: committing inside cursor loop |
| Previous Message | Tomas Vondra | 2018-03-26 19:17:09 | Re: [HACKERS] PATCH: multivariate histograms and MCV lists |