| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: SP-GiST for ranges based on 2d-mapping and quad-tree |
| Date: | 2012-06-21 21:37:48 |
| Message-ID: | 22473.1340314668@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | Postg윈 토토SQL : |
Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 11:12 AM, Heikki Linnakangas <
> heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>> I don't think we want to expose TrickFunctionCall2(). Not with that name,
>> anyway. Perhaps we should refactor the functions called this way,
>> range_adjacent, range_overlaps etc., to have internal counterparts that can
>> be called without FunctionCall(). Like:
> I like idea of replacing TrickFunctionCall2 with internal function. Do you
> think I should post a separate patch for existing GiST code?
+1 ... that was a pretty grotty hack, so let's get rid of it if we can.
It's still going to require some documentation though I think.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2012-06-21 21:53:57 | Re: [v9.3] Extra Daemons (Re: elegant and effective way for running jobs inside a database) |
| Previous Message | Alexander Korotkov | 2012-06-21 21:33:29 | Re: SP-GiST for ranges based on 2d-mapping and quad-tree |