| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgu(at)mailcatch(dot)com |
| Cc: | pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: BUG #14084: typo in LIMIT documentation |
| Date: | 2016-04-14 14:26:37 |
| Message-ID: | 22681.1460643997@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | Postg스포츠 토토SQL : Postg스포츠 토토SQL 메일 링리스트 : 2016-04-14 이후 PGSQL-BUGS 14:26 |
pgu(at)mailcatch(dot)com writes:
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/queries-limit.html
> [...]and LIMIT NULL is the same as omitting the LIMIT clause.
> I guess it should be "LIMIT ALL" not "LIMIT NULL"
No, it means what it says ... but I agree it's a bit confusing,
particularly because the case of OFFSET NULL isn't covered at
the same time.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Fujii Masao | 2016-04-14 14:41:30 | Re: 9.6 synchronous_standby_names: discrepancy between docs and functionality |
| Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2016-04-14 14:22:06 | Re: 9.6 synchronous_standby_names: discrepancy between docs and functionality |