| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>, Gurjeet Singh <singh(dot)gurjeet(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Re: Allow replacement of bloated primary key indexes without foreign key rebuilds |
| Date: | 2012-07-10 16:02:48 |
| Message-ID: | 22748.1341936168@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> Excerpts from Tom Lane's message of mar jul 10 10:44:03 -0400 2012:
>> What we really want is REINDEX CONCURRENTLY.
> http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.47.9961 ?
Hm ... that paper looks like something we might want to incorporate into
btree's VACUUM processing, but it's not very on-point if someone really
wants to rebuild the index totally.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2012-07-10 16:04:50 | Re: Using pg_upgrade on log-shipping standby servers |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2012-07-10 16:00:06 | Re: [PATCH] psql \n shortcut for set search_path = |