| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Philip Warner <pjw(at)rhyme(dot)com(dot)au> |
| Cc: | "PostgreSQL Development" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pg_dump and large files - is this a problem? |
| Date: | 2002-10-02 15:06:31 |
| Message-ID: | 23009.1033571191@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Philip Warner <pjw(at)rhyme(dot)com(dot)au> writes:
> At 09:42 AM 2/10/2002 +1000, Philip Warner wrote:
>> Yes, and do the peripheral stuff to support old archives etc.
> Does silence mean people agree? Does it also mean someone is doing this
> (eg. whoever did the off_t support)? Or does it mean somebody else needs to
> do it?
It needs to get done; AFAIK no one has stepped up to do it. Do you want
to?
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jan Wieck | 2002-10-02 15:09:10 | Re: Purpose of rscale/dscale in NUMERIC? |
| Previous Message | Roland Roberts | 2002-10-02 14:48:45 | Re: (Fwd) Re: Any Oracle 9 users? A test please... |