From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | "Heikki Linnakangas" <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
Cc: | "Patches" <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "Jacky Leng" <lengjianquan(at)163(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Why copy_relation_data only use wal whenWALarchivingis enabled |
Date: | 2007-11-15 20:38:41 |
Message-ID: | 23243.1195159121@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
"Heikki Linnakangas" <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
> Here's an updated version of the patch. There was a bogus assertion in
> the previous one, comparing against mdsync_cycle_ctr instead of
> mdunlink_cycle_ctr.
Applied with minor corrections.
I'm not sure whether we should consider back-patching this. Thoughts?
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2007-11-15 20:49:27 | Re: [HACKERS] 8.3beta1 testing on Solaris |
Previous Message | andrew | 2007-11-15 18:43:21 | Re: Heads up: 8.3beta3 to be wrapped this evening |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alex Vinokur | 2007-11-16 09:19:13 | Re: hashlittle(), hashbig(), hashword() and endianness |
Previous Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2007-11-15 11:23:44 | Re: hashlittle(), hashbig(), hashword() and endianness |