| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Tricky query, tricky response |
| Date: | 1999-12-01 05:17:51 |
| Message-ID: | 23289.944025471@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
>>>> Is this an item for the TODO list?
>>
>> Fixed in current sources, I believe.
> The problem (I sent it in) was actually no sub-selects in target list.
Still fixed in current sources ;-) ...
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | sk.list | 1999-12-01 08:53:21 | Re: [ADMIN] When postgres will be faster? |
| Previous Message | svn | 1999-12-01 04:11:18 | Grabbing Data from serial port into postgres |