| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [CORE] Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL) |
| Date: | 2007-09-03 19:43:52 |
| Message-ID: | 24768.1188848632@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy Postg스포츠 토토SQL : Postg스포츠 |
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> This shows 70% in favor of a change to "Postgres", so far.
Of course, that's 70% of -advocacy, which by nature is going to be the
subset of the community most interested in this change and least
interested in the ensuing costs.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jonah H. Harris | 2007-09-03 19:47:43 | Re: A renaming analogy |
| Previous Message | Devrim GÜNDÜZ | 2007-09-03 19:39:49 | Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL) |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2007-09-03 19:51:02 | Re: [CORE] Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL) |
| Previous Message | Devrim GÜNDÜZ | 2007-09-03 19:39:49 | Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL) |