| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Resurrecting pg_upgrade |
| Date: | 2003-12-17 08:18:04 |
| Message-ID: | 26017.1071649084@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com> writes:
> If you want to prevent "accidential" access, start postmaster on a
> non-standard port.
... thus making pg_upgrade subject to all sorts of interesting questions
about whether particular ports get filtered by kernel iptables rules?
This doesn't seem like a really great alternative to me ...
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2003-12-17 08:25:03 | Re: [PATCHES] Double Backslash example patch |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-12-17 07:06:40 | Re: [HACKERS] 7.4.1 release notes |