| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL Patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Subject: | Re: HISTORY fixes |
| Date: | 2002-10-02 18:46:36 |
| Message-ID: | 26103.1033584396@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-patches |
Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> writes:
> P.S. Rather than updating HISTORY in one go before we make a release,
> what does everyone think of the idea of updating HISTORY whenver a
> patch that makes a user-visible change is committed?
Peter already set up a convention for that: patch the short list near
the front of doc/src/sgml/release.sgml.
HISTORY is a derived file, really; you should be patching release.sgml
I think, not HISTORY.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2002-10-02 21:23:27 | Re: HISTORY fixes |
| Previous Message | Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD | 2002-10-02 16:42:51 | Re: AIX compilation problems (was Re: [HACKERS] Proposal ...) |