From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)fourpalms(dot)org> |
Cc: | Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Did someone break CVS? |
Date: | 2002-08-05 02:08:54 |
Message-ID: | 26883.1028513334@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)fourpalms(dot)org> writes:
> I've removed the arbitrary upper limit on the allowed size of the
> directory path at the same time,
Oh? Have you fixed *every* place that constrains the length limit of
an XLOG-derived file name? Just making XLogDir dynamically allocated
will not improve matters, but IMHO make 'em worse because failures will
occur on-the-fly instead of at startup.
In general I think that removing MAX_PG_PATH limits is a rather
pointless exercise --- no one has yet complained that MAX_PG_PATH is too
small.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joe Conway | 2002-08-05 02:10:20 | Re: anonymous composite types for Table Functions (aka |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2002-08-05 02:05:21 | Re: anonymous composite types for Table Functions (aka SRFs) |