| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: quiet inline configure check misses a step for clang |
| Date: | 2014-05-01 14:10:46 |
| Message-ID: | 27581.1398953446@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> I still think we really need to fix this. I have three possible
> solutions:
> a) Add an external file (in the source tree) that's included in the
> configure test.
> b) Have a compiler specific override and specify USE_INLINE there.
> c) Drop the requirement of quiet inlines.
> a) would probably the best, but I haven't yet found a non ugly solution :(
Why is (a) so hard again?
(If you're wondering where to put the file, I'd vote for the config/
directory.)
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andres Freund | 2014-05-01 14:12:56 | Re: quiet inline configure check misses a step for clang |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2014-05-01 14:08:51 | Re: Why do we allow indexes to contain the same column more than once? |