| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: stand-alone composite types patch (was [HACKERS] Proposal: stand-alone composite types) |
| Date: | 2002-08-09 03:51:51 |
| Message-ID: | 27776.1028865111@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> Shouldn't "integer" be recognized as a valid type?
>> Not when double-quoted; you are being overzealous about quoting.
> I figured that out (new patch works "correctly"), but it does seem
> inconsistent:
Would you expect "point[]" and point[] to be the same?
The actual type name is int4. int4 and "int4" act the same. Aliases
like int and integer are special keywords and so are not recognized
when quoted.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2002-08-09 03:52:36 | Re: CLUSTER and indisclustered |
| Previous Message | Christopher Kings-Lynne | 2002-08-09 02:57:13 | Re: CLUSTER and indisclustered |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2002-08-09 05:13:59 | adding PGPASSWORDFILE to libpq |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2002-08-09 00:50:14 | little psql additions |