| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: XX000: enum value 117721 not found in cache for enum enumcrash |
| Date: | 2012-07-01 19:59:08 |
| Message-ID: | 27898.1341172748@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | Postg스포츠 토토 결과SQL |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Sat, Jun 30, 2012 at 5:51 AM, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>> This is not surprising. psql 2's backend finds rows in the index with enum
>> values that are not visible in its mvcc snapshot.
> I think the problem is that load_enum_cache_data() uses
> GetTransactionSnapshot() rather than GetLatestSnapshot().
That would only make the race condition window smaller (ie, hard
to reproduce manually like this, but not gone).
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2012-07-01 20:18:48 | Re: XX000: enum value 117721 not found in cache for enum enumcrash |
| Previous Message | Alex Hunsaker | 2012-07-01 19:20:58 | Re: Support for array_remove and array_replace functions |