| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jaime Casanova <jaime(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Performance problem in textanycat/anytextcat |
| Date: | 2010-05-16 03:21:36 |
| Message-ID: | 27990.1273980096@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Jaime Casanova <jaime(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 10:16 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> Jaime Casanova <jaime(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
>>> On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 8:51 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>>> Is it reasonable to fix this now, and if so should I bump catversion
>>> or leave it alone? My own preference is to fix it in pg_proc.h but
>>> not touch catversion; but you could argue that different ways.
> ok, then is up to you if you think that it is worth an initdb in
> beta... i still think is excessive...
The point of not wanting to change catversion is to not force an
initdb.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2010-05-16 03:22:55 | Re: pg_upgrade and extra_float_digits |
| Previous Message | Jaime Casanova | 2010-05-16 03:19:27 | Re: Performance problem in textanycat/anytextcat |