| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Kleemann <kleemann(at)scharp(dot)org> |
| Cc: | pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: request for more descriptive plperl error messages |
| Date: | 2007-10-05 19:15:03 |
| Message-ID: | 28115.1191611703@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-interfaces |
Robert Kleemann <kleemann(at)scharp(dot)org> writes:
> I'd like to modify the code to return the perl function name and submit
> a patch but I've never developed in the postgres code base before and am
> not sure where to start. Can the function and schema name be found in
> the FunctionCallInfo structure that is passed?
No. The easiest thing to do is save it in the plperl_proc_desc struct.
See
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-committers/2007-10/msg00117.php
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Kleemann | 2007-10-05 21:05:07 | Re: request for more descriptive plperl error messages |
| Previous Message | Robert Kleemann | 2007-10-05 17:19:48 | Re: request for more descriptive plperl error messages |