From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> |
Cc: | gyenese(at)mediagnost(dot)hu, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: int4, int8, real ....division... |
Date: | 2004-05-21 14:15:48 |
Message-ID: | 28481.1085148948@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> This isn't a division problem --- the difficulty is there's no check for
>> overflow in int4 multiplication. (Nor in any of the other integer
>> arithmetic operations, for that matter.)
> Or am I misreading the spec?
Spec compliance is not the issue here, the issue is devising a
reasonable implementation ...
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | CoL | 2004-05-21 15:32:28 | Re: LATIN2 'bssz' and 'bszsz' fails on unique index |
Previous Message | Neil Conway | 2004-05-21 10:42:13 | Re: int4, int8, real ....division... |