From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Neil Conway <nconway(at)klamath(dot)dyndns(dot)org> |
Cc: | pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: improve SET CONSTRAINTS |
Date: | 2002-08-08 02:23:10 |
Message-ID: | 28636.1028773390@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-patches |
Neil Conway <nconway(at)klamath(dot)dyndns(dot)org> writes:
> I also took the opportunity to remove a bunch of code in trigger.c
> that wasn't doing anything useful, AFAICS -- according to SQL99, SET
> CONSTRAINTS should only apply to the current transaction.
I would assume that Jan and Stephan put that code in for a reason.
"Rip out anything I can't find in SQL99" is not the way we do things
around here ...
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Christopher Kings-Lynne | 2002-08-08 02:29:38 | Re: CLUSTER patch and regression test |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2002-08-08 02:04:17 | Re: CLUSTER patch and regression test |