| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | RekGRpth <rekgrpth(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Richard Guo <guofenglinux(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: BUG #18247: Integer overflow leads to negative width |
| Date: | 2023-12-15 03:20:21 |
| Message-ID: | 2903192.1702610421@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
RekGRpth <rekgrpth(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> How bad would it be if, after overflowing, the width value was within
> the allowed range?
Really pretty negligible, I should think. You might get a not-great
choice of plan. As Richard noted, there are some Asserts you could
hit; but not in a production build.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alexander Lakhin | 2023-12-15 06:00:00 | Re: BUG #18247: Integer overflow leads to negative width |
| Previous Message | RekGRpth | 2023-12-15 03:13:44 | Re: BUG #18247: Integer overflow leads to negative width |