From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: proposal - psql - show longest tables |
Date: | 2013-07-22 23:37:00 |
Message-ID: | 29128.1374536220@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> Is looking for the biggest tables a common enough thing that it should
> be available to everyone, without needing custom customization?
I don't really think so. It's surely not much harder than
select relname, pg_relation_size(oid) from pg_class order by 2 desc;
Moreover, the people who need this likely don't need it as a psql
command, but rather as something available to monitoring tools.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2013-07-22 23:40:53 | Re: proposal - psql - show longest tables |
Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2013-07-22 23:35:47 | Re: ALTER SYSTEM SET command to change postgresql.conf parameters (RE: Proposal for Allow postgresql.conf values to be changed via SQL [review]) |