| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
| Cc: | pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us, ntufar(at)gmail(dot)com, devrim(at)kivi(dot)com(dot)tr, mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working |
| Date: | 2005-12-05 14:35:57 |
| Message-ID: | 29294.1133793357@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> However, a very simple test shows that the libintl printf does indeed do
> %m$ processing:
> ...
> So the next question is why isn't it working in the build.
Is it possible that the build that was being complained of was using our
previous, very-broken snprintf.c?
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2005-12-05 14:47:43 | Re: Reducing relation locking overhead |
| Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2005-12-05 14:19:31 | Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2005-12-05 15:44:45 | Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working |
| Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2005-12-05 14:19:31 | Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working |